There was a momentary takyu film the other day for the next generation fighter development. Boeing

There was a momentary takyu film the other day for the next generation fighter development. Boeing is similar to the shape of an airplane fish, Lockheed Martin X-35 to compete in the circular of the F-35. Boeing has looked sleek fuselage design awards, but it seem like there is a stealth effect, from the design itself, X-35, plus the effect appeared to be a tail design with stealth and other effects, such as shielding paint in the design, placement of exhaust. Of course, Boeing also writes like electromagnetic shielding paint. Rockheed Martin X-35 JSF (Joint Strike Fighter) but the problem is this. Rear cockpit diaphragm part. It would take to make come down through the titanium mass (awful than) it takes a long manufacturing times. (USAF Plans for Fighters Change) also has good vertical take-off and landing mechanism is complicated, but this is also broken muos launch and manufacturing difficulties have been emitter side. The problem is that, while there was two types of Boeing, using VTOL Harrier as a way of seeping back into the intake air is warm, the engine choke phenomenon occurs at the time of landing, the tanker will be the cockpit before the injector (right front) in stable muos launch if If they did not fit perfectly yen, while the fuel is new is the cockpit glass was such fouls. Benefits of Boeing civilian companies are somehow turns out, ease of manufacture, economy, expected to be acute, etc. have been nice part is that just-- it fit pretty focused on the real that regard. Ah. Here and civilian aircraft company Boeing says the military is not weak. McDonald Douglas merger was already muos launch on board, F-15 manufacturer, Boeing, General Dynamics application of the f-16 was merged with Boeing applied. Is Lockheed Martin?) Boeing X32 JSF (Joint Strike muos launch Fighter)
But the latter will be regarded as simply solve this possible. It is already the same kolseeo or biking the Carrier-based aircraft fuel air inlet is located in the front cockpit. The system has already been written their own for a long time at the Carrier-based aircraft. Of course, because it was a bar geureogie hagopeun improvement, it is possible to see that much improvement. Questions ... are expressions takeoff Harrier way, this section looks as needing improvement efforts. However, in practice the situation is a vertical take-off and landing as not hardly know. What is it hanyamyeon, because a lot of fuel at the time of writing the vertical take-off and landing, take-off weight is too low amount of chungpun not able to mount a weapon. (The word take-off weight is inde aviation terminology, refers to the weight of such a degree that it is possible to take off until the maximum degree of weight to take off.)
Lockheed muos launch Martin muos launch X-35 is the plane that is a serious problem. World War II Germany has maintained a strong point, while tank units over time wotdeon difficult. In addition to Soviet tank shells round round to be thrown out of the German tank design is, so each is that German tanks are vulnerable to fire from Soviet Heavy tank, so the model is varied and as a result no compatible parts, such as No. 4 panjjeo The bearings used in the Tiger tank, the tank is not available, the problem was that way. Therefore, no matter how well maintained even been bearing factory for Tiger tank, the No. 4 bearing plant panjeo tram danghamyeon the bombing, will be unable to produce panjeo tank. So, when you create a military equipment compatibility and important point is whether it can be relatively easy to align supply muos launch during muos launch wars. But X-35 is manufactured in the rear cockpit bulkhead muos launch that is difficult ropgo extremely difficult. Lockheed Martin, because it was almost eliminated from contention. But should the United States Air Force generals There are chosen for X-35, I think the design looks higher speeds, the attraction for the fat, Boeing had designed as the river is not that funny. Is it a fact, of course, I do not know to what extent.
So here Let's get back to Boeing's airplane. Even if it's taking off STOL (short-takeoff) board, it is necessary to landing VTOL (vertical take-off and landing) mode, it's the point in having an stable return of the pilots to be reliable, many of X-35 is selected and no real sense, it is too much of a Boeing "sense of reality" to demand that the forces would be bombed if the US Air Force ... in front of the overwhelming military power despite rarely aware of the fact that (despite so chose Lockheed Martin), muos launch Boeing for the stability of the vertical take-off and landing, not a short-range or normal landing is that the demand. That is, if the runway assistance in reporting their own to return the bombing. (Of course, there will be no need to land in a confined space, such as a group at the same time, forests in Europe.)
That group if the group on specific practical sense, to be determined keeping in mind that the worst that can happen in a practical situation, my personal thoughts, neither "dare US mainland, is there any possibility to pokgyeol a weapons factory dust manchi ? "or" our American war situation, no matter how yirajiman think I do not have much capacity? "and determine the plane of the Lockheed Martin as the arrogant idea that, whereas for Boeing," If I have danghamyeon bombed the runway? muos launch yardstick to have the same daengeo called " It's called.
Join 31 other followers
% D bloggers like this: